Academic & Research
Research methodology holds up under peer review when the platform behavior is inspectable and reproducible. ForceSeatMI is the SDK most labs build on; ForceSeatDI adds native Linux and Raspberry Pi control of the actuators for vestibular research, teleoperation studies, and engineering education - and for a full training simulator the team connects the lab with a vetted integrator.
Engineered for Academic & Research labs.
Research deployments carry hard constraints - reproducibility across runs and labs, integration with the lab toolchain, and millisecond stimulus timing for human-subject work. Each one is an engineering decision, not a marketing claim.
Results That Survive Peer Review
In a research deployment the acceptance test is peer review, not a demo - and a reviewer cannot reproduce what they cannot inspect. A proprietary motion-cueing layer between the experiment and the actuators transforms the commanded signal in ways the methods section cannot reconstruct, and the result stops being reproducible across runs or across labs. What clears review is whether every motion parameter is visible, documented, and reproducible by someone who was never in the room.
A Platform That Joins the Lab Toolchain
Research code does not live in a proprietary Windows application - it lives in MATLAB®/Simulink®, Python and ROS, on Linux workstations, headless rigs and embedded controllers. Motion hardware that only speaks to Windows-only software forces a spare PC into the measurement loop, adds an uncontrolled hop of latency, and turns every OS update into a risk to a multi-year program. A platform that joins the toolchain the lab already trusts keeps the experiment intact; one that does not forces a rebuild around the hardware.
Stimulus Timing the Inner Ear Can Trust
Vestibular thresholds, perception studies and onset-detection work measure effects at the millisecond level - inside the window the inner ear actually resolves. A platform that updates position too slowly, or answers the stimulus late and unevenly, smears the cue the experiment is built to isolate, and the effect that reaches publication can be an artifact of the rig rather than the subject. For human-subject work the timing of the motion has to be as defensible as the measurement taken from it.
Academic & Research
Tap a constraint on the left to see how the platform addresses it.
Results That Survive Peer Review
In a research deployment the acceptance test is peer review, not a demo - and a reviewer cannot reproduce what they cannot inspect. A proprietary motion-cueing layer between the experiment and the actuators transforms the commanded signal in ways the methods section cannot reconstruct, and the result stops being reproducible across runs or across labs. What clears review is whether every motion parameter is visible, documented, and reproducible by someone who was never in the room.
A Platform That Joins the Lab Toolchain
Research code does not live in a proprietary Windows application - it lives in MATLAB®/Simulink®, Python and ROS, on Linux workstations, headless rigs and embedded controllers. Motion hardware that only speaks to Windows-only software forces a spare PC into the measurement loop, adds an uncontrolled hop of latency, and turns every OS update into a risk to a multi-year program. A platform that joins the toolchain the lab already trusts keeps the experiment intact; one that does not forces a rebuild around the hardware.
Stimulus Timing the Inner Ear Can Trust
Vestibular thresholds, perception studies and onset-detection work measure effects at the millisecond level - inside the window the inner ear actually resolves. A platform that updates position too slowly, or answers the stimulus late and unevenly, smears the cue the experiment is built to isolate, and the effect that reaches publication can be an artifact of the rig rather than the subject. For human-subject work the timing of the motion has to be as defensible as the measurement taken from it.
What sets the research motion platform apart
Technical differentiators that directly impact performance in academic & research applications.
Research teams drive the platform directly from their existing simulation framework, with no ForceSeatPM layer in between adding unmeasured latency or uncontrolled signal transformation; the application handles error-handling and diagnostics. Methods sections cite SDK parameters reproducible by peer reviewers.
Without direct API access: weeks of custom middleware development, and the resulting software layer introduces latency and signal processing artifacts that contaminate experimental data.
Embedded controllers and headless lab rigs drive the platform directly. Custom Linux applications interface via USB. Reproducible build environments without proprietary OS coupling.
Windows-only motion software forces research labs to maintain a Windows PC between MATLAB® and the hardware. Every OS upgrade risks experiment breakage; reproducibility across multi-year programs degrades.
Motion stimuli land with temporal precision sufficient for vestibular psychophysics, perception studies, and onset-detection experiments. The platform resolves timing differences at the millisecond level, inside the vestibular processing window.
A research platform whose command timing drifts or jitters cannot deliver motion stimuli with the temporal precision that vestibular threshold experiments require, and the methodology gets challenged at peer review.
Find the right research motion platform.
The platform families that fit this application class - Linear high-payload, Low-Profile 6DOF and compact Qubic sets.
Proven in the Field
Neurorehabilitation Platform
Utah, USA
Torque3 is building a neurorehabilitation platform where robot-assisted, deeply immersive exercises help the brain rebuild lost movement (neuroplasticity).
6DOF full cabin driving simulator
Republic of Korea
Full cabin driving simulator based on 6DOF motion platform for training and educational purposes implemented at Korea University of Technology and Education.
Motion Simulators in Vizium Science Centre
Vizium Science Centre, Latvia
Vizium is a Science Centre in Latvia equipped with motion simulators for educational & entertainment purposes.
Space Flight Simulators
Chorzow, Poland
Space flight simulators by Sim Factor at the Silesian Planetarium, Poland, built on the PS-2ROT3-150. Unlimited rotation in two axes plus a 3DOF seat gives five motion axes that reproduce a full rocket launch sequence.
Questions the team gets first.
SDK access, timing, reproducibility, and who builds the full simulator - answered up front, ahead of the first call.
Yes. ForceSeatDI runs natively on Linux, Raspberry Pi and Windows, so the experiment commands the platform directly with no Windows host between MATLAB®/Simulink® and the motion hardware. ForceSeatDI exposes direct low-level actuator control with built-in kinematics and bindings for C, C++, C#, Python and MATLAB®/Simulink®, which removes the spare measurement PC and its uncontrolled latency hop. The KOREATECH 6DOF driving-research rig integrates its vehicle physics through the ForceSeat SDK and its MATLAB®/Simulink® bindings, keeping the physics model and the motion command inside one lab toolchain across a multi-year program.
Sub-30 ms end-to-end at full payload, measured at the cabin attachment point rather than the motor controller, across the Professional Series including the PS-6TM-550 and PS-6TM-1500 used for research cabins. That is several times shorter than the 150-250 ms of human reaction time, so a commanded stimulus lands inside the window the inner ear resolves rather than smeared by transport delay. The platform updates position at the millisecond level, which is the temporal precision vestibular psychophysics, perception and onset-detection work needs for the cue, not the rig, to be what the subject perceives.
Yes. ForceSeatDI drives the actuators directly in position mode, so no proprietary motion-cueing or washout layer sits between the experiment and the hardware, and the lab supplies its own motion model when the design requires it. Because the command path is the lab's own model down to documented SDK parameters, a methods section can cite control values a reviewer can re-run, and another lab can reproduce the run from those parameters. Every platform ships factory-calibrated with the control parameters documented, and absolute position sensing re-establishes that calibrated baseline on start-up, so the reference is recovered between sessions and after transport.
Up to 1500 kg payload on the PS-6TM-1500, the heaviest in the Professional Series, which covers full instrumented research cabins; the PS-6TM-550 and PS-6TL-250 cover lighter rigs in the same SDK family. A payload rating is the static weight at the neutral position, not a guarantee that every cabin at that weight moves the same way, because a tall cabin with screens on outriggers fights the motion through its moment of inertia, which counts distance from the rotation axis squared. Motion Systems sizes around 15% above the static weight to keep motion authority in reserve, so a tall or cantilevered cabin is worth a quick check; sending its mass, dimensions and the location of the heavy parts lets the team recommend the model that holds that margin.
The hardware stop is model-specific on this lineup. The geared PS-6TM-550 and PS-6TM-1500 carry an emergency stop, while the ex-Qubic PS-6TL-250 uses a Motion-Lock that settles the platform to its lowest position on power loss rather than an E-Stop; all three add software-defined motion-envelope limits that bound travel and speed. As partly completed machinery under Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC, each platform ships with a Declaration of Incorporation, and whoever builds the finished cabin completes the human-use safety validation and the conformity of the finished research system. Reference human-subject deployments include a science-center installation that seats visitors and a neurorehabilitation rig.
Yes. From a short specification - payload, degrees of freedom, and the studies planned - the team issues an indicative quotation a lab can cite in a grant application before funding is confirmed, and confirms lead time at quotation so the build aligns with the university procurement calendar. Each platform ships as partly completed machinery with a Declaration of Incorporation and an EU invoice, and the team supplies the conformity documents a purchasing office files for acceptance.
Yes. Teaching labs build on the same ForceSeat SDK as the research groups - ForceSeatMI is the SDK on about 95% of platform licenses - so a course can have students script motion cues, run repeatable demonstrations, and reuse one platform across labs. For a class that needs the low-level layer, ForceSeatDI commands the actuators directly, the same interface a vestibular study would use.
Discuss an Academic & Research project
The team discusses project requirements directly - platform fit or a full-simulator partner.